--- Log opened Tue Jan 12 00:00:40 2010
00:01 -!- genete [n=carlos@84.122.50.143.dyn.user.ono.com] has left #synfig []
--- Log closed Tue Jan 12 00:13:04 2010
--- Log opened Tue Jan 12 00:25:11 2010
00:25 -!- dooglus_ [n=dooglus@unaffiliated/dooglus] has joined #synfig
00:25 -!- Irssi: #synfig: Total of 16 nicks [1 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 15 normal]
00:25 -!- Irssi: Join to #synfig was synced in 29 secs
02:21 < pixelgeek> 'night all
02:21 -!- pixelgeek [i=86868b4b@gateway/web/freenode/x-etzszoiuysjuatbz] has left #synfig []
05:25 -!- Sepero [n=none@h-96-13-123-79.ip.alltel.net] has joined #synfig
05:43 -!- Seper [n=none@h-96-13-40-228.ip.alltel.net] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)]
07:19 -!- krish [n=krish@122.183.18.122] has joined #synfig
07:59 -!- Kunalagon [n=Kunalago@pc3.telekom.yu] has joined #synfig
08:33 -!- genete [i=d90c1031@gateway/web/freenode/x-kuzdphhackjzfric] has joined #synfig
09:09 -!- genete [i=d90c1031@gateway/web/freenode/x-kuzdphhackjzfric] has quit [Ping timeout: 180 seconds]
09:15 -!- Karl_Stiler [n=el_kallo@aktaia.intevation.org] has joined #synfig
09:18 -!- Netsplit verne.freenode.net <-> irc.freenode.net quits: ebeth`, Sepero, CIA-52, stolf_
09:20 -!- Sepero [n=none@h-96-13-123-79.ip.alltel.net] has joined #synfig
09:20 -!- stolf_ [i=chris@spy.byte.net.nz] has joined #synfig
09:20 -!- CIA-52 [n=CIA@208.69.182.149] has joined #synfig
09:20 -!- ebeth` [i=bip@winfree.gag.com] has joined #synfig
09:26 -!- rylleman [n=david@c213-89-98-99.bredband.comhem.se] has joined #synfig
09:50 -!- klauwhamer [n=felixdhc@ipd50af072.speed.planet.nl] has joined #synfig
12:43 -!- krish [n=krish@122.183.18.122] has quit [Remote closed the connection]
12:45 -!- genete [i=d90c1031@gateway/web/freenode/x-erhtginwqjkjwjer] has joined #synfig
12:48 < genete> synfig users: what do you think on this? http://synfig.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=4994#p4994 and this? http://synfig.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=4995#p4995
13:22 < AkhIL> genete, nice
13:35 < genete> AkhIL: well, I did wait a more deep response to solve my doubts... ;)
15:02 -!- genete [i=d90c1031@gateway/web/freenode/x-erhtginwqjkjwjer] has quit ["Page closed"]
16:00 -!- Kunalagon [n=Kunalago@pc3.telekom.yu] has quit ["Leaving."]
16:05 < Sepero> genete: Recipe- create circle, Remove circle layer, Undo, Create a new circle. The Redo button will still be highlighted.
16:27 -!- rylleman [n=david@c213-89-98-99.bredband.comhem.se] has quit [Remote closed the connection]
16:45 -!- cmw72 [n=Miranda@www.docshp.com] has joined #synfig
16:51 -!- genete [n=carlos@84.122.50.143.dyn.user.ono.com] has joined #synfig
16:52 < genete> Sepero: nice recipe, but what's wrong? I can redo the last deletion and it works as expected o_O
16:53 < Sepero> ok
16:54 < genete> catch you later...
16:54 -!- genete [n=carlos@84.122.50.143.dyn.user.ono.com] has left #synfig []
16:54 < Sepero> genete, under Gimp and Inkscape and similar programs, as soon as a modification is made to the document, the Redo history is deleted.
17:25 -!- Sepero [n=none@h-96-13-123-79.ip.alltel.net] has quit [Nick collision from services.]
17:25 -!- Seper [n=none@h-98-134-59-17.ip.alltel.net] has joined #synfig
17:26 -!- Zelgadis [n=zelgadis@92.124.225.128] has joined #synfig
17:46 -!- Karl_Stiler [n=el_kallo@aktaia.intevation.org] has quit [Remote closed the connection]
18:34 -!- Zelgadis [n=zelgadis@92.124.225.128] has quit ["Bye!"]
22:02 -!- genete [n=carlos@84.122.50.143.dyn.user.ono.com] has joined #synfig
22:03 < genete> hey Seper
22:03 < Seper> indeed
22:03 < genete> the thing is that synfig includes the undos as actions in the redo stack
22:03 < genete> others just jump back in to the undo stack
22:04 < genete> I think Synfig is more powerful
22:04 < genete> you can jump to any undo/redo place
22:04 < genete> and disable some intermediate actions by the checkbox
22:04 < genete> can you do that in Gimp or Inkscape ? ;)
22:05 < Seper> no
22:05 < genete> anyway I think that Synfig works the same as inkscape
22:06 < genete> I can follow your recipe in inkscape with same results
22:06 < genete> oh well
22:06 < genete> not the same
22:07 < Seper> It's um...   akward?  :)
22:08 < Seper> Definitely an interesting and potentially useful feature.
22:08 < genete> let's repeat the recipe
22:08 < genete> 1) create a circle
22:08 < genete> (one entry in the undo stack)
22:08 < genete> 2) delete the circle
22:08 < Seper> I just imagine it would confuse more ppl than it would help.
22:09 < genete> (one entry in the undo stack - delete)
22:09 < genete> (now comes the difference)
22:09 < genete> 3) create a new circle
22:09 < genete> **Inkscape cleans the redo stack
22:09 < genete> ** synfig doesn't clean the redo stack
22:10 < genete> in synfig redo stack are pushed down the stack and undo pushed up
22:10 < genete> it is a double stack LIFO
22:10 < genete> last in first out
22:11 < Seper> I gotcha
22:11 < genete> which is better? dunno
22:11 < genete> it is just different
22:12 < genete> I think that synfig is quite more powerful
22:13 < genete> you can recover a very old action in the stack (sometimes it is not possible and throws an error)
22:14 < Seper> I agree it is more powerful. I guess I'm just thinking that it might be best if it wasn't the default.
22:15 < genete> I haven't had any problem with undo and redo until you pointed it out ;)
22:18 < genete> see you later :)
22:18 -!- genete [n=carlos@84.122.50.143.dyn.user.ono.com] has left #synfig []
22:18 < Seper> genete  okie  :)
22:35 -!- pixelgeek [i=86868b4b@gateway/web/freenode/x-zhwcetbnmvffezwu] has joined #synfig
22:45 -!- klauwhamer [n=felixdhc@ipd50af072.speed.planet.nl] has left #synfig []
--- Log closed Wed Jan 13 00:00:42 2010